Click here to receive your FREE subscription to Campus Technology
Opinion
Learning in the Webiverse: How Do You Grade a Conversation?
6/18/2008
|
|
An Academic Online Conversation
In a real-life conversation last week, a friend told me about a colleague who based all grades this past semester on his student's conversation in Blackboard. The course itself was traditional, but the student's evidence of learning was entirely how well they conversed about the course's topics in the forums in the course management system. How, you might ask, do you evaluate written turns in an ongoing conversation?
The students' first impulse was to just write essays. However, these were not conversational turns, but performances, so they were graded very low. When the students instead started picking up on elements in the previous comment and including references to these elements in their own comments, their grades went up. If the students extended their discourse skills to synthesize several comments in their own comments, they got even higher grades.
Principles for Evaluating Online Conversations
We've already seen one criterion for grading a written conversation: creating coherence. A cohesion element is a linguistic link between one language element and another, such as repetition or re-stating or referring to. By using cohesion elements in written discourse, the interlocutors (conversational partners) produce a coherent conversation.
Awareness of audience is another criterion to use in judging how skilled your students are in sustaining an academic conversation online. If they are responding to other class members online but seem to actually be writing to you, their teacher, then they are not showing awareness of their audience. But, no matter how coherent or audience-aware the students are, if they forget the purpose (goal) of their conversation, and get side-tracked into social chit-chat, then the conversation is no longer academic (social chit chat can work toward the purpose, of course, so this is not a you-can't-have-fun rule).
And, the diction (the words) in academic conversations is necessarily different than in social conversations. A discussion of an idea is not the same as the discussion of a party.
Recommended Reading
- Moodle Gets SCORM Improvements, Security Fixes
New versions of Moodle have been released, bringing the most recent stable build to 1.9.3. The latest round of updates includes a number of bug fixes and security enhancements, as well as improvements to the SCORM module.
- Free 'Morro' Antivirus To Replace Microsoft OneCare
Microsoft is rolling out a free antivirus software program for consumers that will compete with products made by Symantec and McAfee. Code-named "Morro," the AV app is expected to be available by the end of 2009.
- Microsoft Demos New SQL Server Features at PASS
Microsoft Wednesday previewed the ability to centrally manage applications and resources in the planned upgrade of SQL Server, code-named "Kilimanjaro."
- Microsoft Unveils Exchange and SharePoint as Services
Microsoft exec Stephen Elop on Monday announced two hosted solutions from Microsoft--Exchange Online and SharePoint Online--which are now available to organizations of all sizes in the United States. The software, paid for by annual subscriptions, is hosted on Microsoft's servers and supported by Microsoft's channel partners.
- 6 Ways Not To Become Rote Using Instructional Technology
There are, in my experience, six strategies to consider with any use of technology that will guard against rote use of technology and facilitate critical analysis of teaching and learning effectiveness. In this article, I'll share with you the checklist I work with and encourage others to work with in learning about and using new technology.
- Bringing Student Web "Stuff" to Campus Enterprise Systems
How can an institution incorporate Web 2.0 learning opportunities for students, and evidence of learning from those opportunities, into existing campus technologies and processes? PlugJam is providing part of the answer.
